Capture one vs lightroom fuji skin#
It comes at the cost of slightly waxier skin tones but it does look a little nicer. Capture One corrects for this noise pattern a little better and pulls out slightly more detail. Since Fujifilm uses the X-Trans sensor, you often get a strange noise pattern to the images. It used to be that Capture One did some things like highlight recovery better, but Adobe has improved here over the years. Lightroom gives you access to all the cameras color profiles, Capture One only gives you access to Fujifilm film simulators. If you like grain (I do) Capture One gives you way more control over the grain style. Lightroom does HDR merging and Panorama Stitching, Capture One does not.
Lightroom does Collections, Capture one does Albums. Lightroom has that sweet super easy to use Catalog, although Capture One’s catalog isn’t so bad either. Capture One has color wheels, color curves, color levels, Lightroom just has one set of curves but it has camera calibration tools which are very powerful. Both programs have very different strengths and weaknesses. I’ve been testing the two programs back and forth and I have to say the better program really depends on what you want. I will summarize since I can’t get too deep into all the features of each program in a written review, it would take forever, but mainly we are going to look at some straight out of camera samples and compare the default RAW converter process.Ĭapture One vs Lightroom | Best Raw Converter
All you hear about is how much better Capture One is than Lightroom, but is this true for every brand of camera? Does capture one handle X-Trans better and are Capture One’s colors better?
0 kommentar(er)
